************************************************** ** update on 1 September 2005 by Piet Stammes ** ************************************************** This GOME surface albedo database has been made by Dr. Robert Koelemeijer and is described in: Koelemeijer, R. B. A., J. F. de Haan, and P. Stammes, A database of spectral surface reflectivity in the range 335-772 nm derived from 5.5 years of GOME observations, J. Geophys. Res., 2003, Vol. 108 (D2), doi 10.1029/2002JD002429 This database is provided on an "as is" basis. If you use this database, please refer to the above publication, and to the TEMIS website https://www.temis.nl/surface/albedo/gome_ler.php. ** Contact ** Dr. Piet Stammes Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI) Climate Research and Seismology Department P.O. Box 201, 3730 AE De Bilt, The Netherlands phone: +31 30 2206 459 fax: +31 30 2210 407 email: stammes@knmi.nl ** Outline of method ** The database contains minimum Lambert-equivalent reflectivities (MLER) values at eleven 1-nm wide wavelength bins centered at 335.0, 380.0, 416.0, 440.0, 463.0, 494.5, 555.0, 610.0, 670.0, 758.0, 772.0 nm. Lambert-equivalent reflectivities (LERs) are derived from the GOME data using the Doubling-Adding KNMI (DAK) polarized radiative transfer code. The model consists of an atmosphere for which Rayleigh scattering and ozone absorption is taken into account, and which is bounded below by a Lambertian surface. For each GOME pixel and wavelength, the LER is found as the value of the surface albedo in the radiative transfer model needed to match the observed top-of-atmosphere reflectivity. The GOME data considered were acquired in the period June 27, 1995 -- December 31, 2000. The LER spectra are then binned per month and in grid-cells of 1*1 degree. The MLER is then determined as the minimum LER in each grid-cell and each month, over a period of 5.5 years, and preforming corrections for missing data, cloud contamination, etc (see FLAG files). The minimum is searched at 670 nm, and the corresponding values pertaining to this GOME pixel are stored in the database, to ensure that the MLER values of different wavelengths are derived from the same GOME spectrum. In addition to the database with monthly minimum values, a database was made with annual minimum values, containing the minimum MLER value that occurred in each of the twelve months for each grid cell and wavelength. In this database of annual minimum LER values it is no longer the case that the values are derived from the same GOME spectrum, as minima at different wavelength generally occur in different months. Both the monthly minimum and the annual minimum databases are accompanied by a database of flags, which keeps track of corrections that have been applied to each grid cell. ** Files ** sacspecTOTL01_335.dat -- monthly minimum LER values (MLER) for month 01 (January) and wavelength 335 nm sacspecALLM335.dat -- data for 335 nm, annual minimum values sacspecFLAG01.dat -- file with flags corresponding to the TOTL-files sacspecFLAG335.dat -- file with flags corresponding to the ALLM-files The MLER values are three digit integers, and should be divided by 1000 to obtain the MLER in the range (0,1). The format resembles the well-known TOMS format. ** Fortran subroutine to read the files ** subroutine rd_cscdb(filename,header,iler) implicit none integer i,j character*100 filename character*75 header(3) character*14 string integer iler(180,360) open(10,file=filename) do i=1,3 read(10,'(a)') header(i) enddo do i=1,180 read(10,91) (iler(i,j),j=1,360),string enddo close(10) 91 format(14(25i3/),10i3,a14) return end ** Meaning of values in FLAG files ** ------------------ FLAG EXPLANATION ------------------ 0 OK, no corrections applied 1 Residual clouds above ocean detected => replaced by weighted average of surrounding pixels in 5*5 degr area 2 Monthly variation threshold exceeded => replaced by maximum of adjacent months 3 Missing data, filled in by nearest month with data (in case of polar regions which are observed only part of the year), or with average of adjacent pixels at same latitude (in case of ERS-2 tape recorder overflow gap) 4 Missing data, filled in by surrounding pixels in 3*3 degr area 5 Missing data throughout the year. Data copied from other location with similar surface properties (polar areas) VALUE+10 Residual cloud contamination likely in final data